QSHC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Quality and Safety in Health Care 2007;16:387-399; doi:10.1136/qshc.2006.022194
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thor, J.
Right arrow Articles by Brommels, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thor, J.
Right arrow Articles by Brommels, M.
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

DEVELOPING RESEARCH AND PRACTICE

Application of statistical process control in healthcare improvement: systematic review

Johan Thor, Jonas Lundberg, Jakob Ask, Jesper Olsson, Cheryl Carli, Karin Pukk Härenstam, Mats Brommels

Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

Correspondence to:
Dr Johan Thor
Medical Management Centre, Berzelius väg 3, 5th floor, Karolinska Institutet, S-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden; johan.thor{at}ki.se
ABSTRACT
Objective: To systematically review the literature regarding how statistical process control—with control charts as a core tool—has been applied to healthcare quality improvement, and to examine the benefits, limitations, barriers and facilitating factors related to such application.

Data sources: Original articles found in relevant databases, including Web of Science and Medline, covering the period 1966 to June 2004.

Study selection: From 311 articles, 57 empirical studies, published between 1990 and 2004, met the inclusion criteria.

Methods: A standardised data abstraction form was used for extracting data relevant to the review questions, and the data were analysed thematically.

Results: Statistical process control was applied in a wide range of settings and specialties, at diverse levels of organisation and directly by patients, using 97 different variables. The review revealed 12 categories of benefits, 6 categories of limitations, 10 categories of barriers, and 23 factors that facilitate its application and all are fully referenced in this report. Statistical process control helped different actors manage change and improve healthcare processes. It also enabled patients with, for example asthma or diabetes mellitus, to manage their own health, and thus has therapeutic qualities. Its power hinges on correct and smart application, which is not necessarily a trivial task. This review catalogues 11 approaches to such smart application, including risk adjustment and data stratification.

Conclusion: Statistical process control is a versatile tool which can help diverse stakeholders to manage change in healthcare and improve patients’ health.


Abbreviations: MRSA, methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus; PEFR, peak expiratory flow rate; QI, quality improvement; RCT, randomised controlled trial; SPC, statistical process control


Related Article

Quality Lines
David P Stevens
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2007 16: 322. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.