HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Evans, S M Articles by DeWit, M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Evans, S M Articles by DeWit, M

Attitudes and barriers to incident reporting: a collaborative hospital study

¹ Department of Medicine, University of Adelaide, South Australia, 5005
² Research Centre for Injury Studies, Flinders University, South Australia, 5001
³ Clinical Epidemiology and Health Outcomes Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, South Australia, 5011
⁴ School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of South Australia, South Australia, 5000

Correspondence to:
MsS Evans
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Victoria, Australia; sue.evans{at}med.monash.edu.au Objectives: To assess awareness and use of the current incident reporting system and to identify factors inhibiting reporting of incidents in hospitals.

Design, setting and participants: Anonymous survey of 186 doctors and 587 nurses from diverse clinical settings in six South Australian hospitals (response rate = 70.7% and 73.6%, respectively).

Main outcome measures: Knowledge and use of the current reporting system; barriers to incident reporting.

Results: Most doctors and nurses (98.3%) were aware that their hospital had an incident reporting system. Nurses were more likely than doctors to know how to access a report (88.3% v 43.0%; relative risk (RR) 2.05, 95% CI 1.61 to 2.63), to have ever completed a report (89.2% v 64.4%; RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.61), and to know what to do with the completed report (81.9% v 49.7%; RR 1.65, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.13). Staff were more likely to report incidents which are habitually reported, often witnessed, and usually associated with immediate outcomes such as patient falls and medication errors requiring corrective treatment. Near misses and incidents which occur over time such as pressure ulcers and DVT due to inadequate prophylaxis were least likely to be reported. The most frequently stated barrier to reporting for doctors and nurses was lack of feedback (57.7% and 61.8% agreeing, respectively).

Conclusions: Both doctors and nurses believe they should report most incidents, but nurses do so more frequently than doctors. To improve incident reporting, especially among doctors, clarification is needed of which incidents should be reported, the process needs to be simplified, and feedback given to reporters.

Keywords: incident reporting; patient safety; nurses’ views; doctors’ views

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Braithwaite, M. Westbrook, and J. Travaglia Attitudes toward the large-scale implementation of an incident reporting system Int. J. Qual. Health Care, June 1, 2008; 20(3): 184 - 191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Leong, J. Afrow, H. P. Weber, and H. Howell Attitudes Toward Patient Safety Standards in U.S. Dental Schools: A Pilot Study J Dent Educ., April 1, 2008; 72(4): 431 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M Evans, B. J Smith, A. Esterman, W. B Runciman, G. Maddern, K. Stead, P. Selim, J. O'Shaughnessy, S. Muecke, and S. Jones Evaluation of an intervention aimed at improving voluntary incident reporting in hospitals Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2007; 16(3): 169 - 175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. A. Rickrode, M. E. Williams-Lowe, J. L. Rippe, and R. H. Theriault Jr. Internal reporting system to improve a pharmacy's medication distribution process Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., June 1, 2007; 64(11): 1197 - 1202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Hirose, S. E Regenbogen, S. Lipsitz, Y. Imanaka, T. Ishizaki, M. Sekimoto, E.-H. Oh, and A. A Gawande Lag time in an incident reporting system at a university hospital in Japan Qual. Saf. Health Care, April 1, 2007; 16(2): 101 - 104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. B.-A. Sari, T. A Sheldon, A. Cracknell, and A. Turnbull Sensitivity of routine system for reporting patient safety incidents in an NHS hospital: retrospective patient case note review BMJ, January 13, 2007; 334(7584): 79 - 79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Braithwaite, M. T Westbrook, N. A Mallock, J. F Travaglia, and R. A Iedema Experiences of health professionals who conducted root cause analyses after undergoing a safety improvement programme Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2006; 15(6): 393 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]