QSHC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Quality and Safety in Health Care 2005;14:284-289; doi:10.1136/qshc.2004.012542
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ursprung, R
Right arrow Articles by Goldmann, D A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ursprung, R
Right arrow Articles by Goldmann, D A

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Real time patient safety audits: improving safety every day

R Ursprung1, J E Gray2, W H Edwards3, J D Horbar4, J Nickerson5, P Plsek6, P H Shiono7, G K Suresh8, D A Goldmann9

1 Children’s Hospital Boston, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Center for Patient Safety in Neonatal Intensive Care, Burlington, VT, USA
2 Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Center for Patient Safety in Neonatal Intensive Care, Burlington, VT, USA
3 Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, NH; Center for Patient Safety in Neonatal Intensive Care, Burlington, VT, USA
4 University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT; Vermont Oxford Network, Burlington, VT; Center for Patient Safety in Neonatal Intensive Care, Burlington, VT, USA
5 Center for Patient Safety in Neonatal Intensive Care, Burlington, VT, USA
6 Paul E Plsek and Associates Inc, Atlanta, GA; Center for Patient Safety in Neonatal Intensive Care, Burlington, VT, USA
7 Vermont Oxford Network, Burlington, VT; Center for Patient Safety in Neonatal Intensive Care, Burlington, VT, USA
8 Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; Center for Patient Safety in Neonatal Intensive Care, Burlington, VT, USA
9 Children’s Hospital Boston, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Center for Patient Safety in Neonatal Intensive Care, Burlington, VT; Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge, MA, USA

Correspondence to:
Dr R Ursprung
Pediatrix Medical Group, Department of Clinical Quality Improvement, Cook Children’s Medical Center, Department of Neonatology, Fort Worth, TX 76104, USA; Robert_ursprung{at}pediatrix.com Background: Timely error detection including feedback to clinical staff is a prerequisite for focused improvement in patient safety. Real time auditing, the efficacy of which has been repeatedly demonstrated in industry, has not been used previously to evaluate patient safety. Methods successful at improving quality and safety in industry may provide avenues for improvement in patient safety.

Objective: Pilot study to determine the feasibility and utility of real time safety auditing during routine clinical work in an intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods: A 36 item patient safety checklist was developed via a modified Delphi technique. The checklist focused on errors associated with delays in care, equipment failure, diagnostic studies, information transfer and non-compliance with hospital policy. Safety audits were performed using the checklist during and after morning work rounds thrice weekly during the 5 week study period from January to March 2003.

Results: A total of 338 errors were detected; 27 (75%) of the 36 items on the checklist detected >=1 error. Diverse error types were found including unlabeled medication at the bedside (n = 31), ID band missing or in an inappropriate location (n = 70), inappropriate pulse oximeter alarm setting (n = 22), and delay in communication/information transfer that led to a delay in appropriate care (n = 4).

Conclusions: Real time safety audits performed during routine work can detect a broad range of errors. Significant safety problems were detected promptly, leading to rapid changes in policy and practice. Staff acceptance was facilitated by fostering a blame free "culture of patient safety" involving clinical personnel in detection of remediable gaps in performance, and limiting the burden of data collection.


Keywords: patient safety; errors; random process auditing; real time audit




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeoReviewsHome page
F. H. Morriss Jr
Adverse Medical Events in the NICU: Epidemiology and Prevention
NeoReviews, January 1, 2008; 9(1): e8 - e23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crit Care NurseHome page
E. A. Henneman
Unreported Errors in the Intensive Care Unit: A Case Study of the Way We Work
Crit. Care Nurse, October 1, 2007; 27(5): 27 - 34.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
M K Szekendi, C Sullivan, A Bobb, J Feinglass, D Rooney, C Barnard, and G A Noskin
Active surveillance using electronic triggers to detect adverse events in hospitalized patients.
Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2006; 15(3): 184 - 190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
Education
Arch. Dis. Child., April 1, 2006; 91(suppl_1): A74 - A77.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
R Invaso
Real time patient safety audits
Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2005; 14(6): 464 - 464.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.