|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
1 Consultant Anaesthetist, Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, Kent, UK
2 Professor and Head, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
3 Senior Staff Specialist, Department of Anaesthesia, St Vincents Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
4 Senior Staff Specialist, Intensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital and University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
5 Clinical Quality Co-ordinator, Goulburn Base Hospital, Goulburn and Consultant in Clinical Quality, Southern Area Health Service, New South Wales, Australia
Correspondence to:
Professor W B Runciman
President, Australian Patient Safety Foundation, GPO Box 400, Adelaide, South Australia 5001, Australia; research{at}apsf.net.au
Background: Hypertension occurs commonly during anaesthesia and is usually promptly and appropriately treated by anaesthetists. However, its recognition is dependent on correctly functioning and calibrated monitors. If it is not diagnosed and/or promptly corrected, it has the potential to cause significant morbidity and even mortality.
Objectives: To examine the role of a previously described core algorithm "COVER ABCDA SWIFT CHECK" supplemented by a specific sub-algorithm for the management of hypertension occurring in association with anaesthesia.
Methods: The potential performance of this approach for each of the relevant incidents among the first 4000 reported to the Australian Incident Monitoring Study (AIMS) was compared with the actual management as reported by the anaesthetists involved.
Results: There were 70 reports of intraoperative hypertension among the first 4000 incidents reported to AIMS. Drug related causes accounted for 59% of all incidents. It was considered that, properly applied, this structured approach would have led to a quicker and/or better resolution of the problem in 21% of the cases.
Conclusion: Once hypertension is identified and confirmed, its rapid control by the careful use of a volatile anaesthetic agent, intravenous opioids, or rapidly acting antihypertensives will usually avoid serious morbidity. If hypertension is unresponsive to the treatment recommended in the relevant sub-algorithm, an unusual cause such as phaeochromocytoma, carcinoid syndrome, or thyroid storm should be considered.
Keywords: hypertension; drug errors; morbidity; anaesthesia complications; crisis management
Relevant Article
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2005 14: 156-163.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Radiology Quiz Case 1: Diagnosis Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, March 1, 2006; 132(3): 344 - 345. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W B Runciman, M T Kluger, R W Morris, A D Paix, L M Watterson, and R K Webb Crisis management during anaesthesia: the development of an anaesthetic crisis management manual Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2005; 14(3): e1 - e1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L M Watterson, R W Morris, J A Williamson, and R N Westhorpe Crisis management during anaesthesia: tachycardia Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2005; 14(3): e10 - e10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |