¹ Clinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit, Royal College of Physicians, London and Consultant Stroke Physician, Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
² Clinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK
³ Clinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit, Royal College of Physicians London and Consultant Physician, Aintree Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr A Rudd
Clinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit, Royal College of Physicians, 11 St Andrews Place, London NW1 4LE, UK; anthony.rudd{at}kcl.ac.uk Objectives: To use data from the 2001–2 National Stroke Audit to describe the organisation of stroke units in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, and to see if key characteristics deemed effective from the research literature were present.

Design: Data were collected as part of the National Sentinel Audit of Stroke in 2001, both on the organisation and structure of inpatient stroke care and the process of care to hospitals managing stroke patients.

Setting: 240 hospitals from England, Wales and Northern Ireland took part in the 2001–2 National Stroke Audit, a response rate of over 95%. These sites audited a total of 8200 patients.

Audit tool: Royal College of Physicians Intercollegiate Working Party Stroke Audit Tool.

Results: 73% of hospitals participating in the audit had a stroke unit but only 36% of stroke admissions spent any time on one. Only 46% of all units describing themselves as stroke units had all five organisational characteristics that previous research literature had identified as being key features, while 26% had four and 28% had three or less. Better organisation was associated with better process of care for patients, with patients managed on stroke units receiving better care than those managed in other settings.

Conclusion: The National Service Framework for Older People set a target for all hospitals treating stroke patients to have a stroke unit by April 2004. This study suggests that in many hospitals this is being achieved without adequate resource and expertise.

Keywords: stroke units; national audit

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D A Cadilhac, D C Pearce, C R Levi, G A Donnan, and on behalf of the Greater Metropolitan Clinical Tas Improvements in the quality of care and health outcomes with new stroke care units following implementation of a clinician-led, health system redesign programme in New South Wales, Australia Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2008; 17(5): 329 - 333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. M.T. Schouten, M. E.J.L. Hulscher, R. Akkermans, J. J.E. van Everdingen, R. P.T.M. Grol, and R. Huijsman Factors That Influence the Stroke Care Team's Effectiveness in Reducing the Length of Hospital Stay Stroke, September 1, 2008; 39(9): 2515 - 2521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L C Price, D Lowe, H S R Hosker, K Anstey, M G Pearson, C M Roberts, and on behalf of the British Thoracic Society and the UK National COPD Audit 2003: impact of hospital resources and organisation of care on patient outcome following admission for acute COPD exacerbation Thorax, October 1, 2006; 61(10): 837 - 842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. K. Myint, S. L. Vowler, O. Redmayne, and R. A. Fulcher Utilisation of diagnostic computerised tomography imaging and immediate clinical outcomes in older people with stroke before and after introduction of the National Service Framework for older people. A comparative study of hospital-based stroke registry data (1997-2003): Norfolk experience. Age Ageing, July 1, 2006; 35(4): 399 - 403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Oliver, M. E T McMurdo, and S. Patel Secondary prevention of falls and osteoporotic fractures in older people BMJ, July 16, 2005; 331(7509): 123 - 124. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K M McPherson and H K McNaughton When is a stroke unit not a stroke unit? Qual. Saf. Health Care, February 1, 2005; 14(1): 6 - 6. [Full Text] [PDF]