HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mohr, J Articles by Barach, P Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mohr, J Articles by Barach, P

Integrating patient safety into the clinical microsystem

¹ Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA
² Department of Pediatrics, Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Dartmouth, USA
³ Department of Anesthesiology, Miami Center for Patient Safety, University of Miami, Miami, USA

Correspondence to:
Assistant Professor J J Mohr
Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 2007, Chicago, IL 60637, USA; jmohr{at}medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu Healthcare institutions continue to face challenges in providing safe patient care in increasingly complex organisational and regulatory environments while striving to maintain financial viability. The clinical microsystem provides a conceptual and practical framework for approaching organisational learning and delivery of care. Tensions exist between the conceptual theory and the daily practical applications of providing safe and effective care within healthcare systems. Healthcare organisations are often complex, disorganised, and opaque systems to their users and their patients. This disorganisation may lead to patient discomfort and harm as well as much waste. Healthcare organisations are in some sense conglomerates of smaller systems, not coherent monolithic organisations. The microsystem unit allows organisational leaders to embed quality and safety into a microsystem’s developmental journey. Leaders can set the stage for making safety a priority for the organisation while allowing individual microsystems to create innovative strategies for improvement.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Bognar, P. Barach, J. K. Johnson, R. C. Duncan, D. Birnbach, D. Woods, J. L. Holl, and E. A. Bacha Errors and the Burden of Errors: Attitudes, Perceptions, and the Culture of Safety in Pediatric Cardiac Surgical Teams Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2008; 85(4): 1374 - 1381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. C Foster, J. K Johnson, E. C Nelson, and P. B Batalden Using a Malcolm Baldrige framework to understand high-performing clinical microsystems Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2007; 16(5): 334 - 341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. R. Kresse, M. A. Kuklinski, and J. G. Cacchione An Evidence-Based Template for Implementation of Multidisciplinary Evidence-Based Practices in a Tertiary Hospital Setting American Journal of Medical Quality, May 1, 2007; 22(3): 148 - 163. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. C. Seiden and P. Barach Wrong-Side/Wrong-Site, Wrong-Procedure, and Wrong-Patient Adverse Events: Are They Preventable? Arch Surg, September 1, 2006; 141(9): 931 - 939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]