HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Healey, A N Articles by Vincent, C A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Healey, A N Articles by Vincent, C A

Developing observational measures of performance in surgical teams

Clinical Safety Research Unit, Imperial College, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr A N Healey
Clinical Safety Research, Imperial College London, Department of Surgical Oncology and Technology, 10th Floor QEQM, St Mary’s Hospital, Praed Street, Paddington, London W2 1NY, UK; a.healey{at}imperial.ac.uk Team performance is increasingly recognised as an essential foundation of good surgical care and a determinant of good surgical outcome. To understand team performance and to develop team training, reliable and valid measures of team performance are necessary. Currently there is no firm consensus on how to measure teamwork, partly because of a lack of empirical data to validate measures. The input–process–output model provides a framework for surgical team studies. Objective observational measures are needed in surgery as a basis for interdisciplinary team assessment and training. The "observational teamwork assessment for surgery" (OTAS) tool assesses two facets of the surgical process. Observer 1 monitors specific tasks carried out by team members, under the categories patient, environment, equipment, provisions, and communications. Observer 2 uses a behavioural observation scale to rate behaviour for the three surgical phases (pre-operative, operative, and post-operative) with components of teamwork: cooperation, leadership, coordination, awareness, and communication. Illustrative data from an initial series of 50 cases is presented here. The OTAS tool enables two independent observers, a surgeon and psychologist, to record detailed information both on what the theatre team does and how they do it, and has the potential to identify constraints on performance that might relate to surgical outcome.

Abbreviations: OTAS, observational teamwork assessment for surgery

Keywords: surgery; team; teamwork; performance; observational; assessment

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A N Healey, C P Primus, and M Koutantji Quantifying distraction and interruption in urological surgery Qual. Saf. Health Care, April 1, 2007; 16(2): 135 - 139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A N Healey, S Undre, and C A Vincent Defining the technical skills of teamwork in surgery. Qual. Saf. Health Care, August 1, 2006; 15(4): 231 - 234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S C Seiden, C Galvan, and R Lamm Role of medical students in preventing patient harm and enhancing patient safety. Qual. Saf. Health Care, August 1, 2006; 15(4): 272 - 276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]