HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Habiba, M Articles by Dixon-Woods, M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Habiba, M Articles by Dixon-Woods, M Topic Collections Related Article

Women’s accounts of consenting to surgery: is consent a quality problem?

¹ Reproductive Sciences Section, University of Leicester, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK
² Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 6TP, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr M Dixon-Woods
Reproductive Sciences Section, University of Leicester, 22–28 Princess Road West, Leicester LE1 6TP, UK; md11{at}le.ac.uk Background: Consent has been placed at the centre of doctor-patient relationships. Attempts to improve the consent process in medicine have drawn on bioethical and legal traditions. Current approaches to consent emphasise the provision of information and have, in the UK, resulted in a single standardised format and process for both elective and emergency situations. Investigation of patients’ perceptions and priorities are important in understanding the quality of the consent process.

Methods: In this qualitative study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 25 women. Eleven had elective and 14 had emergency operations in obstetrics and gynaecology. All interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data analysis was based on the constant comparative method.

Results: Participants’ perceptions of surgery strongly influenced the meanings they gave to consent. Some, particularly those undergoing elective operations, wanted surgery. Others were uncertain of their desire for surgery or felt that it was imposed on them. Consenting was interpreted as a ritualistic legal procedure. There was an overwhelming tendency to view consent as not primarily serving patients’ needs, although some advantages of the consent process were identified. Accounts made no reference to ethics.

Conclusion: Countering paternalism will remain difficult to achieve if issues surrounding consent continue to be debated between professionals without due effort to reflect patients’ own views and values and to appreciate the circumstances under which consent is sought.

Keywords: patient consent; doctor-patient relationship; patients’ views

Related Article

Informed consent: don’t throw out the moral baby with the critical bath water

L Doyal
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2004 13: 414-415. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Akkad, C. Jackson, S. Kenyon, M. Dixon-Woods, N. Taub, and M. Habiba Patients' perceptions of written consent: questionnaire study BMJ, September 9, 2006; 333(7567): 528. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S Kenyon, M Dixon-Woods, C J Jackson, K Windridge, and E Pitchforth Participating in a trial in a critical situation: a qualitative study in pregnancy. Qual. Saf. Health Care, April 1, 2006; 15(2): 98 - 101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Marcovitch What's new this month in BMJ Journals BMJ, February 12, 2005; 330(7487): 330 - 330. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L Doyal Informed consent: don't throw out the moral baby with the critical bath water Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2004; 13(6): 414 - 415. [Full Text] [PDF]