HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Karsh, B-T Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Karsh, B-T

Beyond usability: designing effective technology implementation systems to promote patient safety

Correspondence to:
Dr B-T Karsh
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1513 University Avenue, Room 387, Madison, WI 53706, USA; bkarsh{at}engr.wisc.edu
ABSTRACT
Evidence is emerging that certain technologies such as computerized provider order entry may reduce the likelihood of patient harm. However, many technologies that should reduce medical errors have been abandoned because of problems with their design, their impact on workflow, and general dissatisfaction with them by end users. Patient safety researchers have therefore looked to human factors engineering for guidance on how to design technologies to be usable (easy to use) and useful (improving job performance, efficiency, and/or quality). While this is a necessary step towards improving the likelihood of end user satisfaction, it is still not sufficient. Human factors engineering research has shown that the manner in which technologies are implemented also needs to be designed carefully if benefits are to be realized. This paper reviews the theoretical knowledge on what leads to successful technology implementation and how this can be translated into specifically designed processes for successful technology change. The literature on diffusion of innovations, technology acceptance, organisational justice, participative decision making, and organisational change is reviewed and strategies for promoting successful implementation are provided. Given the rapid and ever increasing pace of technology implementation in health care, it is critical for the science of technology implementation to be understood and incorporated into efforts to improve patient safety.

Keywords: human factors engineering; patient safety; technology implementation

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. J. Weiner, H. Amick, and S.-Y. D. Lee Review: Conceptualization and Measurement of Organizational Readiness for Change: A Review of the Literature in Health Services Research and Other Fields Med Care Res Rev, August 1, 2008; 65(4): 379 - 436. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. M. Walker, P. Carayon, N. Leveson, R. A. Paulus, J. Tooker, H. Chin, A. Bothe Jr., and W. F. Stewart EHR Safety: The Way Forward to Safe and Effective Systems J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2008; 15(3): 272 - 277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-H. Wu, W.-S. Shen, L.-M. Lin, R. A. Greenes, and D. W. Bates Testing the technology acceptance model for evaluating healthcare professionals' intention to use an adverse event reporting system Int. J. Qual. Health Care, April 1, 2008; 20(2): 123 - 129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. C. Elder, D. Graham, E. Brandt, and J. Hickner Barriers and Motivators for Making Error Reports from Family Medicine Offices: A Report from the American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network (AAFP NRN) J Am Board Fam Med, March 1, 2007; 20(2): 115 - 123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]