QSHC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, S M
Right arrow Articles by Roland, M O
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, S M
Right arrow Articles by Roland, M O
Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:115-120
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute for Healthcare Improvement


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Improving the quality of mental health services in Personal Medical Services pilots: a longitudinal qualitative study

S M Campbell1, J Robison2, A Steiner3, D Webb2, M O Roland1

1 National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
2 Department of Social Work Studies, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
3 Department of Community Studies, University of California Santa Cruz, College Eight Faculty Services, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA

Correspondence to:
Dr S M Campbell
National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; stephen.campbell{at}man.ac.uk Background: A series of government initatives in the UK have included strategies to improve the quality of services received by patients, including fundholding, the development of National Service Frameworks, clinical governance, and Personal Medical Services (PMS). PMS represents a new contractual arrangement between government and general practitioners (GPs) which provides new investment in return for more detailed specification of processes and outcomes of care.

Objectives: To evaluate the effects of PMS on the quality of primary mental health care between 1998 and 2001.

Design: Multiple longitudinal case studies. Semi-structured interviews with key staff within practices (GPs, nurses, practice managers) and outside (health authority and primary care group/trust managers).

Sample: Six first wave PMS sites which had specifically planned to improve their mental health care.

Results: Improvements in mental health care were found in some PMS practices and not in others. Five mechanisms associated with successful quality improvement in mental health were identified: clear goals, effective teamwork within the practice, routine use of protocols and audits, additional resources, and effective collaboration with community and secondary care. Sites where these factors were not present struggled to meet their objectives.

Conclusion: The five mechanisms which resulted in improved mental health care were facilitated by the new contractual arrangements in PMS. The new contracts were not a necessary part of these changes, but they enabled sites with an identified interest and motivation to make the changes. The contractual changes were not in themselves sufficient to improve care.


Keywords: mental health; personal medical services; quality improvement; general practice




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
S. M Campbell, M. O Roland, E. Middleton, and D. Reeves
Improvements in quality of clinical care in English general practice 1998-2003: longitudinal observational study
BMJ, November 12, 2005; 331(7525): 1121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.