QSHC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Henriksen, K
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Henriksen, K
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, H
Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:ii46
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute for Healthcare Improvement


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Hindsight bias, outcome knowledge and adaptive learning

K Henriksen1, H Kaplan2

1 Center for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
2 Columbia University, College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY 10032, USA

Correspondence to:
Dr K Henriksen
Center for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD 20850, USA; khenriks{at}ahrq.gov The ubiquitous nature of hindsight bias is a cause for concern for those engaged in investigations and retrospective analysis of medical error. Hindsight does not equal foresight. Investigations that are anchored to outcome knowledge run the risk of not capturing the complexities and uncertainties facing sharp end personnel and why their actions made sense at the time. Important lessons go unlearned if the exercise is simply to back track someone else’s decision landmarks. Outcome knowledge can also bias our thinking on the quality of the processes that led to the outcome. This paper examines the influence of outcome knowledge in relation to reconstructive memory and legal testimony, ways for reducing the impact of outcome knowledge, and an adaptive learning framework that places hindsight bias in a broader context of rapid updating of knowledge.


Keywords: medical error; hindsight bias; outcome knowledge




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
V Arora, J Johnson, D Lovinger, H J Humphrey, and D O Meltzer
Communication failures in patient sign-out and suggestions for improvement: a critical incident analysis
Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2005; 14(6): 401 - 407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
M. L. Graber, N. Franklin, and R. Gordon
Diagnostic Error in Internal Medicine
Arch Intern Med, July 11, 2005; 165(13): 1493 - 1499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.