QSHC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parker, D
Right arrow Articles by Lawton, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Parker, D
Right arrow Articles by Lawton, R
Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:453-457
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute for Healthcare Improvement


ORGANISATIONAL MATTERS

Psychological contribution to the understanding of adverse events in health care

D Parker1, R Lawton2

1 Department of Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
2 Department of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr D Parker
Department of Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; Parker{at}fs4.psy.man.ac.uk
ABSTRACT
In the past it has sometimes been assumed in health care that all adverse events involve individual incompetence and therefore blameworthiness, an assumption that is likely to hinder the development of comprehensive and honest incident reporting systems. At the same time, a full understanding of adverse events in healthcare systems requires that distinctions are drawn between a variety of error types, each of which has different origins and demands different strategies for remediation. In this paper a range of cognitive biases identified by psychologists is described. Examples are given of these biases, which are naturally employed in trying to understand our own behaviour and that of others, and therefore affect our understanding of adverse events. It is suggested that awareness of these biases, which form part of our normal thinking, should help to avoid a narrow focus on individual culpability and facilitate a more sophisticated approach to the investigation of adverse events.


Keywords: psychology; cognitive biases; human error; adverse events




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Research in NursingHome page
G. Armitage, A. Holder, and I. Hodgson
Using ethnography (or qualitative methods) to investigate drug errors: A critique of a published study
Journal of Research in Nursing, September 1, 2004; 9(5): 379 - 387.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.