HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Severens, J L Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Severens, J L

Value for money of changing healthcare services? Economic evaluation of quality improvement

Correspondence to:
J L Severens PhD, University of Maastricht/University Hospital Maastricht, Department of Health Organisation, Policy, and Economics/Department of Clinical Epidemiology and MTA, P O Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands;
h.severens{at}beoz.unimaas.nl
ABSTRACT
There are many instances of perceived or real inefficiencies in health service delivery. Both healthcare providers and policy makers need to know the impact and cost of applying strategies to change the behaviour of individuals or organisations. Quality improvement or implementation research is concerned with evaluating the methods of behavioural change. Addressing inefficiencies in healthcare services raises a series of issues, beginning with how inefficiency itself should be defined. The basic concepts of cost analysis and economic evaluations are explained and a model for working through the economic issues of quality improvement is discussed. This model combines the costs and benefits of corrected inefficiency with the costs and degree of behavioural change achieved by a quality improvement method in the policy maker’s locality. It shows why it may not always be cost effective for policy makers to address suboptimal behaviour. Both the interpretation of quality improvement research findings and their local application need careful consideration. The limited availability of applicable quality improvement research may make it difficult to provide robust advice on the value for money of many behavioural quality improvement strategies.

Keywords: quality improvement research; health policy; cost effectiveness analysis

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Fenwick, K. Claxton, and M. Sculpher The Value of Implementation and the Value of Information: Combined and Uneven Development Med Decis Making, February 1, 2008; 28(1): 21 - 32. [Abstract] [PDF]