|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
Department of Practice and Policy, The School of Pharmacy, University of London, London WC1N 1AX, UK
Correspondence to:
Dr K Taxis, Pharmazeutische Biologie, Pharmazeutisches Institut, Universitaet Tuebingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 8, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany;
katja.taxis{at}uni-tuebingen.de
Background: Intravenous (IV) medication errors are frequent events. They are associated with considerable harm, but little is known about their causes. Human error theory is increasingly used to understand adverse events in medicine, but has not yet been applied to study IV errors. Our aim was to investigate causes of errors in IV drug preparation and administration using a framework of human error theory.
Methods: A trained and experienced observer accompanied nurses during IV drug rounds on 10 wards in two hospitals (one university teaching hospital and one non-teaching hospital) in the UK. Information came from observation and talking informally to staff. Human error theory was used to analyse the causes of IV error.
Results: 265 IV drug errors were identified during observation of 483 drug preparations and 447 administrations. The most common type of error was the deliberate violation of guidelines when injecting bolus doses faster than the recommended speed of 35 minutes. Causes included a lack of perceived risk, poor role models, and available technology. Mistakes occurred when drug preparation or administration involved uncommon procedures such as the preparation of very small volumes or the use of unusual drug vial presentations. Causes included a lack of knowledge of preparation or administration procedures and complex design of equipment. Underlying problems were the cultural context allowing unsafe drug use, the failure to teach practical aspects of drug handling, and design failures.
Conclusions: Training needs and design issues should be addressed to reduce the rate of IV drug preparation and administration errors. This needs a coordinated approach from practitioners, regulators, and the pharmaceutical industry.
Keywords: human error theory; medication errors; intravenous treatment
Relevant Articles
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2003 12: 326-327.
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2003 12: 396.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Proceedings of a summit on preventing patient harm and death from i.v. medication errors Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., December 15, 2008; 65(24): 2367 - 2379. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Nemec, H. Kopelent-Frank, and R. Greif Standardization of infusion solutions to reduce the risk of incompatibility Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., September 1, 2008; 65(17): 1648 - 1654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Reeves, A. Kuper, and B. D. Hodges Qualitative research methodologies: ethnography BMJ, August 7, 2008; 337(aug07_3): a1020 - a1020. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C Brown, T Hofer, A Johal, R Thomson, J Nicholl, B D Franklin, and R J Lilford An epistemology of patient safety research: a framework for study design and interpretation. Part 3. End points and measurement Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2008; 17(3): 170 - 177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. D Hayes, W. Klein-Schwartz, and S. Doyon Frequency of Medication Errors with Intravenous Acetylcysteine for Acetaminophen Overdose Ann. Pharmacother., June 1, 2008; 42(6): 766 - 770. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. Bates Preventing medication errors: A summary Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., July 15, 2007; 64(14_Supplement_9): S3 - S9. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W B Runciman, J A H Williamson, A Deakin, K A Benveniste, K Bannon, and P D Hibbert An integrated framework for safety, quality and risk management: an information and incident management system based on a universal patient safety classification Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2006; 15(suppl_1): i82 - i90. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P Y Han, I D Coombes, and B Green Factors predictive of intravenous fluid administration errors in Australian surgical care wards Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2005; 14(3): 179 - 184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D H Cousins, B Sabatier, D Begue, C Schmitt, and T Hoppe-Tichy Medication errors in intravenous drug preparation and administration: a multicentre audit in the UK, Germany and France Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2005; 14(3): 190 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Husch, C Sullivan, D Rooney, C Barnard, M Fotis, J Clarke, and G Noskin Insights from the sharp end of intravenous medication errors: implications for infusion pump technology Qual. Saf. Health Care, April 1, 2005; 14(2): 80 - 86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Armitage, A. Holder, and I. Hodgson Using ethnography (or qualitative methods) to investigate drug errors: A critique of a published study Journal of Research in Nursing, September 1, 2004; 9(5): 379 - 387. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Dixon-Woods, R L Shaw, S Agarwal, and J A Smith The problem of appraising qualitative research Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2004; 13(3): 223 - 225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. A Kazandjian Does appropriate prescribing result in safer care? Qual. Saf. Health Care, February 1, 2004; 13(1): 9 - 10. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Minerva BMJ, October 25, 2003; 327(7421): 998 - 998. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Dixon-Woods What can ethnography do for quality and safety in health care? Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2003; 12(5): 326 - 327. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |