HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fischhoff, B Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fischhoff, B

Hindsight foresight: the effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty^*

Correspondence to:
B Fischhoff, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
ABSTRACT
One major difference between historical and nonhistorical judgment is that the historical judge typically knows how things turned out. In Experiment 1, receipt of such outcome knowledge was found to increase the postdicted likelihood of reported events and change the perceived relevance of event descriptive data, regardless of the likelihood of the outcome and the truth of the report. Judges were, however, largely unaware of the effect that outcome knowledge had on their perceptions. As a result, they overestimated what they would have known without outcome knowledge (Experiment 2), as well as what others (Experiment 3) actually did know without outcome knowledge. It is argued that this lack of awareness can seriously restrict one’s ability to judge or learn from the past.

Keywords: judgement; hindsight; foresight

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H Singh, L A Petersen, and E J Thomas Understanding diagnostic errors in medicine: a lesson from aviation. Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2006; 15(3): 159 - 164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Hindsight and judgment J. Med. Ethics, December 1, 2003; 29(6): 329 - 329. [Full Text]