QSHC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Questionnaires and Data Sheet
Right arrow Publisher's Correction
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Britten, N
Right arrow Articles by Stevenson, F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Britten, N
Right arrow Articles by Stevenson, F
Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:246-250
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group & Institute for Healthcare Improvement


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Developing a measure for the appropriateness of prescribing in general practice

N Britten1, L Jenkins1, N Barber2, C Bradley3, F Stevenson1

1 GKT Concordance Unit, Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Guy’s King’s and St Thomas’ School of Medicine, King’s College London
2 Department of Practice and Policy, The School of Pharmacy, University of London
3 Department of General Practice, University College, Cork

Correspondence to:
Professor N Britten, Institute of Clinical Education, Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Plymouth and Exeter, St Luke’s Campus, Exeter, Devon EX1 2LU, UK;
nicky.britten{at}pms.ac.uk Objective: To explore the feasibility of using a broader definition of the appropriateness of prescribing in general practice by developing ways of measuring this broader definition and by identifying possible relationships between different aspects of appropriateness and patient outcomes.

Design: A questionnaire study of patients and general practitioners before and after study consultations, supplemented by data collected from patients’ medical records and telephone interviews with patients 1 week later.

Setting: General practices in the south of England.

Participants: 24 general practitioners and 186 of their consulting patients.

Main outcome measures: Unwanted, unnecessary, and pharmacologically inappropriate prescriptions; patients’ adherence.

Results: Before the consultation 42% of patients said they wanted or expected a prescription for their main problem. Prescriptions were written in two thirds (65%) of study consultations, and 7% of these had not been wanted or expected beforehand. Doctors recorded that one in five prescriptions they wrote were not strictly indicated. Of the 92 independent assessments of these prescriptions, four were judged to be inappropriate and in 19 cases the assessors were uncertain. 41% of prescriptions written were wanted, necessary, and appropriate. Subsequently, 18% of patients for whom a prescription had been written were potentially non-adherent and 25% had worries or concerns about their medication.

Conclusion: The attempt to measure appropriateness of prescribing along the three dimensions of patients’, prescribers’, and pharmacological perspectives is both feasible and likely to yield valuable insights into the nature of general practice prescribing and patients’ use of medicines.


Keywords: general practice; patient-caregiver relationship; prescribing




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
S. Latter, J. Maben, M. Myall, and A. Young
Evaluating the clinical appropriateness of nurses' prescribing practice: method development and findings from an expert panel analysis
Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2007; 16(6): 415 - 421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
E. Bromley
Clinicians' Concepts of the Cognitive Deficits of Schizophrenia
Schizophr Bull, May 1, 2007; 33(3): 648 - 651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
W. Hamilton, D. Russell, C. Stabb, D. Seamark, C. Campion-Smith, and N. Britten
The effect of patient self-completion agenda forms on prescribing and adherence in general practice: a randomized controlled trial
Fam. Pract., February 1, 2007; 24(1): 77 - 83.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Research in NursingHome page
S. Latter, J. Maben, M. Myall, A. Young, and A. Baileff
Evaluating prescribing competencies and standards used in nurse independent prescribers' prescribing consultations: An observation study of practice in England
Journal of Research in Nursing, January 1, 2007; 12(1): 7 - 26.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
M. P. Tully and J. A. Cantrill
The validity of explicit indicators of prescribing appropriateness
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, April 1, 2006; 18(2): 87 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
N. Britten
Patients' expectations of consultations
BMJ, February 21, 2004; 328(7437): 416 - 417.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
G Elwyn and J Braspenning
"Doing prescribing": high hopes and unexplored beliefs
Qual. Saf. Health Care, August 1, 2003; 12(4): 243 - 243.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.