QSHC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wu, A W
Right arrow Articles by Lo, B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wu, A W
Right arrow Articles by Lo, B
Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:221-226
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group & Institute for Healthcare Improvement


CLASSIC PAPER

Do house officers learn from their mistakes?*

A W Wu1,2,6, S Folkman4,6, S J McPhee5,6, B Lo2,3,4,5,6

1 Department of Veterans Affairs
2 Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program
3 Program in Medical Ethics
4 Center for AIDS Prevention Studies
5 Division of General Internal Medicine
6 Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA


ABSTRACT
Mistakes are inevitable in medicine. To learn how medical mistakes relate to subsequent changes in practice, we surveyed 254 internal medicine house officers. One hundred and fourteen house officers (45%) completed an anonymous questionnaire describing their most significant mistake and their response to it. Mistakes included errors in diagnosis (33%), prescribing (29%), evaluation (21%), and communication (5%) and procedural complications (11%). Patients had serious adverse outcomes in 90% of the cases, including death in 31% of cases. Only 54% of house officers discussed the mistake with their attending physicians, and only 24% told the patients or families. House officers who accepted responsibility for the mistake and discussed it were more likely to report constructive changes in practice. Residents were less likely to make constructive changes if they attributed the mistake to job overload. They were more likely to report defensive changes if they felt the institution was judgmental. Decreasing the work load and closer supervision may help prevent mistakes. To promote learning, faculty should encourage house officers to accept responsibility and to discuss their mistakes.


Keywords: patient safety; medical errors; training




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
J. Garbutt, D. R. Brownstein, E. J. Klein, A. Waterman, M. J. Krauss, E. K. Marcuse, E. Hazel, Wm. C. Dunagan, V. Fraser, and T. H. Gallagher
Reporting and Disclosing Medical Errors: Pediatricians' Attitudes and Behaviors
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, February 1, 2007; 161(2): 179 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
S C Seiden, C Galvan, and R Lamm
Role of medical students in preventing patient harm and enhancing patient safety.
Qual. Saf. Health Care, August 1, 2006; 15(4): 272 - 276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.