HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Harvey, G Articles by Wensing, M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Harvey, G Articles by Wensing, M

Methods for evaluation of small scale quality improvement projects

¹ Royal College of Nursing Institute, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE, UK
² Centre for Quality of Care Research, University Medical Centre St Radboud, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Correspondence to:
Dr G Harvey, Royal College of Nursing Institute, Radcliffe Infirmary, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6HE, UK
ABSTRACT
Evaluation is an integral component of quality improvement and there is much to be learned from the evaluation of small scale quality improvement initiatives at a local level. This type of evaluation is useful for a number of different reasons including monitoring the impact of local projects, identifying and dealing with issues as they arise within a project, comparing local projects to draw lessons, and collecting more detailed information as part of a bigger evaluation project. Focused audits and developmental studies can be used for evaluation within projects, while methods such as multiple case studies and process evaluations can be used to draw generalised lessons from local experiences and to provide examples of successful projects. Evaluations of small scale quality improvement projects help those involved in improvement initiatives to optimise their choice of interventions and use of resources. Important information to add to the knowledge base of quality improvement in health care can be derived by undertaking formal evaluation of local projects, particularly in relation to building theory around the processes of implementation and increasing understanding of the complex change processes involved.

Keywords: quality improvement research; small scale projects

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F Davidoff and P Batalden Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2005; 14(5): 319 - 325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Garner, M. Meremikwu, J. Volmink, Q. Xu, and H. Smith Putting evidence into practice: how middle and low income countries "get it together" BMJ, October 30, 2004; 329(7473): 1036 - 1039. [Full Text] [PDF]