HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Read responses to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Locock, L Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Locock, L

Healthcare redesign: meaning, origins and application

Correspondence to:
L Locock, Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of Oxford, Barnett House, Wellington Square, Oxford OX1 2ER, UK;
louise.locock{at}socres.ox.ac.uk
ABSTRACT
Healthcare organisations are using redesign to tackle variation in the quality of care and improve public satisfaction. It is represented as a radical challenge to traditional assumptions and practices which involves thinking through the best process to achieve speedy and effective patient care, identifying delays, unnecessary steps, or potential for error, and redesigning the process to improve the quality of care. This paper explores the meaning of redesign using practical illustrations. It examines its theoretical origins, particularly total quality management (TQM)/continuous quality improvement (CQI) and re-engineering, and assesses evidence which may inform its application. This evidence suggests that clinical ownership and senior management support will be essential. Redesign seeks to balance the more gradual approach of TQM with the organisation-wide lateral thinking of re-engineering. An incremental negotiated approach seems more likely to ensure clinical ownership, but carries a risk that QI will remain small scale with little impact on the wider organisation. Inclusion of some re-engineering techniques may help to overcome this difficulty. Evidence suggests that most QI techniques achieve only partial success. This may pose difficulties for redesign, which has generated high political expectations that it can solve long term problems in health care.

Keywords: total quality management; quality improvement; redesign; re-engineering

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T P Young and S I McClean A critical look at Lean Thinking in healthcare Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2008; 17(5): 382 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Soubhi Toward an Ecosystemic Approach to Chronic Care Design and Practice in Primary Care Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2007; 5(3): 263 - 269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. G. Shojania and J. M. Grimshaw Evidence-Based Quality Improvement: The State Of The Science Health Aff., January 1, 2005; 24(1): 138 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O A Arah and N S Klazinga How safe is the safety paradigm? Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2004; 13(3): 226 - 232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R Gollop, E Whitby, D Buchanan, and D Ketley Influencing sceptical staff to become supporters of service improvement: a qualitative study of doctors' and managers' views Qual. Saf. Health Care, April 1, 2004; 13(2): 108 - 114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters: