QSHC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eccles, M
Right arrow Articles by Ramsay, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eccles, M
Right arrow Articles by Ramsay, C
Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:47-52
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group & Institute for Healthcare Improvement


QUALITY IMPROVEMENT RESEARCH

Research designs for studies evaluating the effectiveness of change and improvement strategies

M Eccles1, J Grimshaw2, M Campbell3, C Ramsay3

1 Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
2 Clinical Epidemiology Programme, Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
3 Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK

Correspondence to:
Professor M Eccles, Professor of Clinical Effectiveness, Centre for Health Services Research, 21 Claremont Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AA, UK;martin.eccles{at}ncl.ac.uk
ABSTRACT
The methods of evaluating change and improvement strategies are not well described. The design and conduct of a range of experimental and non-experimental quantitative designs are considered. Such study designs should usually be used in a context where they build on appropriate theoretical, qualitative and modelling work, particularly in the development of appropriate interventions. A range of experimental designs are discussed including single and multiple arm randomised controlled trials and the use of more complex factorial and block designs. The impact of randomisation at both group and individual levels and three non-experimental designs (uncontrolled before and after, controlled before and after, and time series analysis) are also considered. The design chosen will reflect both the needs (and resources) in any particular circumstances and also the purpose of the evaluation. The general principle underlying the choice of evaluative design is, however, simple—those conducting such evaluations should use the most robust design possible to minimise bias and maximise generalisability.


Keywords: quality improvement research; clinical trial design




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
P. M. Johansson, A. P. de Leon, S. Sadigh, P. E. Tillgren, and C. Rehnberg
Statistical modelling needed to find the effects from a community-based elderly safety promotion program
Eur J Public Health, November 7, 2008; (2008) ckn102v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
C. Zimmermann, I. F. Tannock, and G. Rodin
Studying the Effectiveness of Palliative Care--Reply
JAMA, September 3, 2008; 300(9): 1023 - 1024.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
I. Shcherbatykh, A. Holbrook, L. Thabane, L. Dolovich, and COMPETE III investigators
Methodologic Issues in Health Informatics Trials: The Complexities of Complex Interventions
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2008; 15(5): 575 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
S. Mahant, R. Peterson, M. Campbell, D. L. MacGregor, and J. N. Friedman
Reducing Inappropriate Hospital Use on a General Pediatric Inpatient Unit
Pediatrics, May 1, 2008; 121(5): e1068 - e1073.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
J. Thor, J. Lundberg, J. Ask, J. Olsson, C. Carli, K. P. Harenstam, and M. Brommels
Application of statistical process control in healthcare improvement: systematic review
Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2007; 16(5): 387 - 399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GerontologistHome page
J. Robison, L. Curry, C. Gruman, M. Porter, C. R. Henderson Jr., and K. Pillemer
Partners in Caregiving in a Special Care Environment: Cooperative Communication Between Staff and Families on Dementia Units
Gerontologist, August 1, 2007; 47(4): 504 - 515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. S. Raab, F. A. Meier, R. J. Zarbo, D. C. Jensen, K. R. Geisinger, C. N. Booth, U. Krishnamurti, C. H. Stone, J. E. Janosky, and D. M. Grzybicki
The "Big Dog" Effect: Variability Assessing the Causes of Error in Diagnoses of Patients With Lung Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., June 20, 2006; 24(18): 2808 - 2814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. H. Bradley, L. A. Curry, T. R. Webster, J. A. Mattera, S. A. Roumanis, M. J. Radford, R. L. McNamara, B. A. Barton, D. N. Berg, and H. M. Krumholz
Achieving Rapid Door-To-Balloon Times: How Top Hospitals Improve Complex Clinical Systems
Circulation, February 28, 2006; 113(8): 1079 - 1085.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
H E Bloomfield, D B Nelson, M van Ryn, B J Neil, N J Koets, J N Basile, F F Samaha, R Kaul, J L Mehta, and D Bouland
A trial of education, prompts, and opinion leaders to improve prescription of lipid modifying therapy by primary care physicians for patients with ischemic heart disease
Qual. Saf. Health Care, August 1, 2005; 14(4): 258 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin TrialsHome page
M. K Campbell, P. M Fayers, and J. M Grimshaw
Determinants of the intracluster correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials: the case of implementation research
Clinical Trials, April 1, 2005; 2(2): 99 - 107.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
P. Durieux
Electronic Medical Alerts -- So Simple, So Complex
N. Engl. J. Med., March 10, 2005; 352(10): 1034 - 1036.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
K. G. Shojania and J. M. Grimshaw
Evidence-Based Quality Improvement: The State Of The Science
Health Aff., January 1, 2005; 24(1): 138 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
S. L Jackson, G. M Peterson, and J. H Vial
A Community-Based Educational Intervention to Improve Antithrombotic Drug Use in Atrial Fibrillation
Ann. Pharmacother., November 1, 2004; 38(11): 1794 - 1799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
P. Hawe, A. Shiell, T. Riley, and L. Gold
Methods for exploring implementation variation and local context within a cluster randomised community intervention trial
J Epidemiol Community Health, September 1, 2004; 58(9): 788 - 793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
J Grimshaw, L M McAuley, L A Bero, R Grilli, A D Oxman, C Ramsay, L Vale, and M Zwarenstein
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of quality improvement strategies and programmes
Qual. Saf. Health Care, August 1, 2003; 12(4): 298 - 303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
L. M McAuley, J. Grimshaw, and M. Zwarenstein
Scope of EPOC is clarified
BMJ, July 10, 2003; 327(7406): 106 - 106.
[Full Text]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. Gilbody, P. Whitty, J. Grimshaw, and R. Thomas
Educational and Organizational Interventions to Improve the Management of Depression in Primary Care: A Systematic Review
JAMA, June 18, 2003; 289(23): 3145 - 3151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
G Harvey and M Wensing
Methods for evaluation of small scale quality improvement projects
Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2003; 12(3): 210 - 214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.