| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
1 Director of Research, Picker Institute Europe, Oxford and Director of Health Care Outcomes Research, Health Services Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
2 Chief Executive, Picker Institute Europe, Oxford and Visiting Professor of Health Services Research, University of Oxford
3 UK Manager, Picker Institute Europe
4 Project Manager, Picker Institute Europe
5 Senior Research Fellow, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Royal Free and University College Medical School, University College London, London, UK
Correspondence to:
Dr C Jenkinson, Director of Research, Picker Institute Europe, Oxpens Road, Oxford OX1 1RX, UK;
crispin.jenkinson{at}pickereurope.ac.uk
Objective: To determine what aspects of healthcare provision are most likely to influence satisfaction with care and willingness to recommend hospital services to others and, secondly, to explore the extent to which satisfaction is a meaningful indicator of patient experience of healthcare services.
Design: Postal survey of a sample of patients who underwent a period of inpatient care. Patients were asked to evaluate their overall experience of this episode of care and to complete the Picker Inpatient Survey questionnaire on specific aspects of their care.
Sample: Patients aged 18 and over presenting at five hospitals within one NHS trust in Scotland.
Method: 3592 questionnaires were mailed to patients’ homes within 1 month of discharge from hospital during a 12 month period. Two reminders were sent to non-responders; 2249 (65%) questionnaires were returned.
Results: Almost 90% of respondents indicated that they were satisfied with their period of inpatient care. Age and overall self-assessed health were only weakly associated with satisfaction. A multiple linear regression indicated that the major determinants of patient satisfaction were physical comfort, emotional support, and respect for patient preferences. However, many patients who reported their satisfaction with the care they received also indicated problems with their inpatient care as measured on the Picker Inpatient Survey; 55% of respondents who rated their inpatient episode as "excellent" indicated problems on 10% of the issues measured on the Picker questionnaire.
Discussion: The evidence suggests that patient satisfaction scores present a limited and optimistic picture. Detailed questions about specific aspects of patients’ experiences are likely to be more useful for monitoring the performance of various hospital departments and wards and could point to ways in which delivery of health care could be improved.
Keywords: patient satisfaction; patient preferences; quality improvement
Relevant Article
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2002 11: 394.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. A. A. Caljouw, M. van Beuzekom, and F. Boer Patient's satisfaction with perioperative care: development, validation, and application of a questionnaire Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2008; 100(5): 637 - 644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P J Marang-van de Mheen, N van Duijn-Bakker, and J Kievit Surgical adverse outcomes and patients' evaluation of quality of care: inherent risk or reduced quality of care? Postgrad. Med. J., February 1, 2008; 84(988): 93 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Heidegger, M. Nuebling, D. Saal, and G. Kreienbuhl Patient-centred outcomes in clinical research: does it really matter? Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2008; 100(1): 1 - 3. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. J Marang-van de Mheen, N. van Duijn-Bakker, and J. Kievit Surgical adverse outcomes and patients' evaluation of quality of care: inherent risk or reduced quality of care? Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2007; 16(6): 428 - 433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. M. Edward, L. C. Lemaire, B. Preckel, F. J. Oort, M. J. L. Bucx, M. W. Hollmann, and J. C. J. M. de Haes Patient Experiences with the Preoperative Assessment Clinic (PEPAC): validation of an instrument to measure patient experiences Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2007; 99(5): 666 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Morris, O. Payne, and A. Lambert Patient, carer and staff experience of a hospital-based stroke service Int. J. Qual. Health Care, April 1, 2007; 19(2): 105 - 112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. McNair, P. Gardiner, J. R. Sandy, and A. C. Williams A qualitative study to develop a tool to examine patients' perceptions of NHS orthodontic treatment. J. Orthod., June 1, 2006; 33(2): 97 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A M Garratt, O A Bjaertnes, U Krogstad, and P Gulbrandsen The OutPatient Experiences Questionnaire (OPEQ): data quality, reliability, and validity in patients attending 52 Norwegian hospitals Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2005; 14(6): 433 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Gonzalez, J. M. Quintana, A. Bilbao, A. Escobar, F. Aizpuru, A. Thompson, C. Esteban, J. A. S. Sebastian, and E. de la Sierra Development and validation of an in-patient satisfaction questionnaire Int. J. Qual. Health Care, December 1, 2005; 17(6): 465 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H Snooks, N Kearsley, J Dale, M Halter, J Redhead, and W Y Cheung Towards primary care for non-serious 999 callers: results of a controlled study of "Treat and Refer" protocols for ambulance crews Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2004; 13(6): 435 - 443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Cleopas, V Kolly, P A Bovier, P Garnerin, and T V Perneger Acceptability of identification bracelets for hospital inpatients Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2004; 13(5): 344 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R Fitzpatrick Capturing what matters to patients when they evaluate their hospital care Qual. Saf. Health Care, January 12, 2002; 11(4): 306 - 306. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
