HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cooper, J. B Articles by McPeek, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cooper, J. B Articles by McPeek, B.

Preventable anesthesia mishaps: a study of human factors*

¹ Laboratories of the Bioengineering Unit, Department of Anaesthesia, Harvard Medical School at the Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA

ABSTRACT
A modified critical-incident analysis technique was used in a retrospective examination of the characteristics of human error and equipment failure in anesthetic practice. The objective was to uncover patterns of frequently occurring incidents that are in need of careful prospective investigation. Forty seven interviews were conducted with staff and resident anesthesiologists at one urban teaching institution, and descriptions of 359 preventable incidents were obtained. Twenty three categories of details from these descriptions were subjected to computer-aided analysis for trends and patterns. Most of the preventable incidents involved human error (82%), with breathing-circuit disconnections, inadvertent changes in gas flow, and drug syringe errors being frequent problems. Overt equipment failures constituted only 14% of the total number of preventable incidents, but equipment design was indictable in many categories of human error, as were inadequate experience and insufficient familiarity with equipment or with the specific surgical procedure. Other factors frequently associated with incidents were inadequate communication among personnel, haste or lack of precaution, and distraction. Results from multi-hospital studies based on the methodology developed could be used for more objective determination of priorities and planning of specific investments for decreasing the risk associated with anesthesia.

Keywords: anaesthesia; safety; accidents; equipment failure

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Phipps, G. H. Meakin, P. C. W. Beatty, C. Nsoedo, and D. Parker Human factors in anaesthetic practice: insights from a task analysis Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2008; 100(3): 333 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. H. Dzik Technology for Enhanced Transfusion Safety Hematology, January 1, 2005; 2005(1): 476 - 482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Lederer and A. Benzer Programming errors from patient-controlled analgesia Can J Anesth, October 1, 2003; 50(8): 854 - 855. [Full Text] [PDF]