| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
1 The Robert Graham Center: Policy Studies in Family Practice and Primary Care, Washington, DC 20036, USA
2 The National Network for Family Practice and Primary Care Research, The American Academy of Family Physicians, Leawood, KS 66211-2672, USA
3 Department of Postgraduate General Practice, The Postgraduate Deanery for Kent, East Surrey and Sussex, Guildford, Surrey GU2 5RF, UK
Correspondence to:
Dr S Dovey, The Robert Graham Center: Policy Studies in Family Practice and Primary Care, 2023 Massachusetts Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, USA;
sdovey{at}aafp.org
Objective: To develop a preliminary taxonomy of primary care medical errors.
Design: Qualitative analysis to identify categories of error reported during a randomized controlled trial of computer and paper reporting methods.
Setting: The National Network for Family Practice and Primary Care Research.
Participants: Family physicians.
Main outcome measures: Medical error category, context, and consequence.
Results: Forty two physicians made 344 reports: 284 (82.6%) arose from healthcare systems dysfunction; 46 (13.4%) were errors due to gaps in knowledge or skills; and 14 (4.1%) were reports of adverse events, not errors. The main subcategories were: administrative failures (102; 30.9% of errors), investigation failures (82; 24.8%), treatment delivery lapses (76; 23.0%), miscommunication (19; 5.8%), payment systems problems (4; 1.2%), error in the execution of a clinical task (19; 5.8%), wrong treatment decision (14; 4.2%), and wrong diagnosis (13; 3.9%). Most reports were of errors that were recognized and occurred in reporters' practices. Affected patients ranged in age from 8 months to 100 years, were of both sexes, and represented all major US ethnic groups. Almost half the reports were of events which had adverse consequences. Ten errors resulted in patients being admitted to hospital and one patient died.
Conclusions: This medical error taxonomy, developed from self-reports of errors observed by family physicians during their routine clinical practice, emphasizes problems in healthcare processes and acknowledges medical errors arising from shortfalls in clinical knowledge and skills. Patient safety strategies with most effect in primary care settings need to be broader than the current focus on medication errors.
Keywords: family practice; medical errors; primary care; taxonomy
Relevant Article
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2002 11: 300.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J McKay, P Bowie, L Murray, and M Lough Levels of agreement on the grading, analysis and reporting of significant events by general practitioners: a cross-sectional study Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2008; 17(5): 339 - 345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G M Kuo, R L Phillips, D Graham, and J M Hickner Medication errors reported by US family physicians and their office staff Qual. Saf. Health Care, August 1, 2008; 17(4): 286 - 290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. G. Kennedy, B. Littenberg, and J. W. Senders Using nurses and office staff to report prescribing errors in primary care Int. J. Qual. Health Care, August 1, 2008; 20(4): 238 - 245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J Hickner, D G Graham, N C Elder, E Brandt, C B Emsermann, S Dovey, and R Phillips Testing process errors and their harms and consequences reported from family medicine practices: a study of the American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2008; 17(3): 194 - 200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D G Graham, D M Harris, N C Elder, C B Emsermann, E Brandt, E W Staton, and J Hickner Mitigation of patient harm from testing errors in family medicine offices: a report from the American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2008; 17(3): 201 - 208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M A B Makeham, S Stromer, C Bridges-Webb, M Mira, D C Saltman, C Cooper, and M R Kidd Patient safety events reported in general practice: a taxonomy Qual. Saf. Health Care, February 1, 2008; 17(1): 53 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 O. Kostopoulou Do GPs report diagnostic errors? Fam. Pract., February 1, 2008; 25(1): 1 - 2. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. R. Wong, T. J. Vander Salm, I. S. Ali, A. K. Agnihotri, R. M.J. Bohmer, and D. F. Torchiana Prospective assessment of intraoperative precursor events during cardiac surgery. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 29(4): 447 - 455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. von Bultzingslowen, G. Eliasson, A. Sarvimaki, B. Mattsson, and P. Hjortdahl Patients' views on interpersonal continuity in primary care: a sense of security based on four core foundations Fam. Pract., April 1, 2006; 23(2): 210 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Wilson, M. Roland, and C. Ham The contribution of general practice and the general practitioner to NHS patients J R Soc Med, January 1, 2006; 99(1): 24 - 28. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Chang, P. M. Schyve, R. J. Croteau, D. S. O'Leary, and J. M. Loeb The JCAHO patient safety event taxonomy: a standardized terminology and classification schema for near misses and adverse events Int. J. Qual. Health Care, April 1, 2005; 17(2): 95 - 105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. A. Boxwala, M. Dierks, M. Keenan, S. Jackson, R. Hanscom, D. W. Bates, and L. Sato Organization and Representation of Patient Safety Data: Current Status and Issues around Generalizability and Scalability J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2004; 11(6): 468 - 478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S M Dovey and R L Phillips What should we report to medical error reporting systems? Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2004; 13(5): 322 - 323. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. H. Fernald, W. D. Pace, D. M. Harris, D. R. West, D. S. Main, and J. M. Westfall Event Reporting to a Primary Care Patient Safety Reporting System: A Report From the ASIPS Collaborative Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2004; 2(4): 327 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. J. Kuzel, S. H. Woolf, V. J. Gilchrist, J. D. Engel, T. A. LaVeist, C. Vincent, and R. M. Frankel Patient Reports of Preventable Problems and Harms in Primary Health Care Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2004; 2(4): 333 - 340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R L Phillips Jr, L A Bartholomew, S M Dovey, G E Fryer Jr, T J Miyoshi, and L A Green Learning from malpractice claims about negligent, adverse events in primary care in the United States Qual. Saf. Health Care, April 1, 2004; 13(2): 121 - 126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. C. Elder, M. V. Meulen, and A. Cassedy The Identification of Medical Errors by Family Physicians During Outpatient Visits Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2004; 2(2): 125 - 129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A J Avery Classifying and identifying errors Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2003; 12(6): 404 - 404. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G Rubin, A George, D J Chinn, and C Richardson Errors in general practice: development of an error classification and pilot study of a method for detecting errors Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2003; 12(6): 443 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F Moss QSHC 2003: now bimonthly Qual. Saf. Health Care, February 1, 2003; 12(1): 7 - 7. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Baker, D. R Jones, and P. Goldblatt Monitoring mortality rates in general practice after Shipman BMJ, February 1, 2003; 326(7383): 274 - 276. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
