QSHC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pouwer, F
Right arrow Articles by Snoek, F J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pouwer, F
Right arrow Articles by Snoek, F J
Qual Saf Health Care 2002;11:131-136
© 2002 Quality and Safety in Health Care


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Patients' Evaluation of the Quality of Diabetes Care (PEQD): development and validation of a new instrument

F Pouwer, F J Snoek

Department of Medical Psychology, Research Institute for Endocrinology, Reproduction and Metabolism, and Diabetes Research Group, Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine (EMGO-Institute), Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Correspondence to:
Dr F Pouwer, Diabetes Research Group, Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine (EMGO-Institute), Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands;
f.pouwer.emgo{at}med.vu.nl Objectives: To develop a brief measure of patients' evaluation of the quality of diabetes care and to study predictors of consumers' rating of the quality of diabetes care.

Design: A prospective design.

Subjects: 176 adults with type 1 (39%) or type 2 (61%) diabetes.

Main measures: Demographic variables, HbA1c, number of diabetes complications, satisfaction with diabetes care, diabetes related distress, and fear of hypoglycaemia were assessed by self-report. In addition, satisfaction with diabetes care and evaluations about quality of the care were measured at 16 month follow up. Statistical analysis comprised principal component analyses, Cronbach's alpha, t tests, Pearson's correlation, and linear regression analyses.

Results: Results in the literature were used to develop the 14 items of the Patients' Evaluation of the Quality of Diabetes Care (PEQD) scale, assessing the most important aspects of the quality of diabetes care as delivered by the specialist in internal medicine (internist) and the diabetes nurse specialist (DNS). Two principal components analyses (internist/DNS) both yielded one 14 item factor with a high internal consistency. Satisfaction with diabetes care, fewer diabetes related complications, fewer treatment related problems, and a low level of worries about hypoglycaemia were predictors of a more positive evaluation of diabetes care delivered by the internist. Sociodemographic variables were not related to the patients' evaluations of the quality of diabetes care.

Conclusions: The PEQD comprises different aspects of quality of diabetes care and can be regarded as a suitable instrument for evaluating patients' judgements about the quality of their care.


Keywords: quality of care; diabetes; patient evaluation; psychometrics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
M. de Wit, H. A. Delemarre-van de Waal, J. A. Bokma, K. Haasnoot, M. C. Houdijk, R. J. Gemke, and F. J. Snoek
Monitoring and Discussing Health-Related Quality of Life in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Improve Psychosocial Well-Being: A randomized controlled trial
Diabetes Care, August 1, 2008; 31(8): 1521 - 1526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2002 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.