QHC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heard, S R
Right arrow Articles by Hall, L M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heard, S R
Right arrow Articles by Hall, L M.
Quality in Health Care 2001;10: ii70-ii78
© 2001 Quality in Health Care


Paper

Continuous quality improvement: educating towards a culture of clinical governance

S R Heard, dean of postgraduate medicine, G Schiller, researcher, M Aitken, project officer, C Fergie, assistant director of medical education, L McCready Hall, SpR anaesthetics

Department of Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education, 20 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1DZ

Dr S R Heard sheard{at}londondeanery.ac.uk The National Health Service in England and Wales has recently adopted a policy aimed at embedding continuous quality improvement (CQI) at all levels and across all services. The key goal is to achieve changes in practice which improve patient outcomes. This paper describes the use of a training course for multiprofessional groups of participants tailored to offer them relevant knowledge, management and team working skills, and approaches to personal and career development. These were intended to assist them in changing their practice for the benefit of patients. The participants rated the course highly in fulfilling its objectives. One cohort followed up for 6 months named changes in practice which related specifically to learning from the course. This paper shows the important contribution of multiprofessional learning to CQI and presents a useful method of evaluating links between learning and performance.

Key Words: continuous quality improvement; clinical governance; multiprofessional learning; performance




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
D. Harari, A. Hopper, J. Dhesi, G. Babic-Illman, L. Lockwood, and F. Martin
Proactive care of older people undergoing surgery ('POPS'): Designing, embedding, evaluating and funding a comprehensive geriatric assessment service for older elective surgical patients
Age Ageing, March 1, 2007; 36(2): 190 - 196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
O. A. Arah, N. S. Klazinga, D. M. J. Delnoij, A. H. A. T. Asbroek, and T. Custers
Conceptual frameworks for health systems performance: a quest for effectiveness, quality, and improvement
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, October 1, 2003; 15(5): 377 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2001 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.