QHC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frewer, L J
Right arrow Articles by Lambert, N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frewer, L J
Right arrow Articles by Lambert, N
Quality in Health Care 2001;10: i50-i54
© 2001 Quality in Health Care


II. Patients'and clinicians' preference

Understanding patients' preferences for treatment: the need for innovative methodologies

L J Frewer, head of attitudes, perceptions and behaviours research programme1, B Salter, professor of health studies research2, N Lambert, food choice and health project leader1

1 Institute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UA, UK
2 NAMRU, Education Building, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK

Dr L J Frewer Lynn.frewer{at}bbsrc.ac.uk Abstract

Treatment selection is now much more consumer driven than in the past. However, there is a need to develop investigative methodological approaches that are sensitive to differences in patient preferences if full account is to be taken of what the patient sees as the best option in terms of different possible treatments available for a particular condition. Previous attitude research has been criticised because it does not provide insight into reasons why people hold different preferences or beliefs. A methodology is described which allows people to describe their concerns and values associated with different treatment options in their own words. This is the repertory grid method of eliciting personal constructs used in conjunction with generalised Procrustes analysis (GPA). An example of the use of this methodology is provided, drawn from research directed towards understanding people's beliefs about genetic technologies. A possible application of the method to understanding treatment preferences related to type 2 diabetes is also discussed. It is concluded that the use of innovative methodologies is essential if our understanding of patient preferences regarding treatment options is to have a significant impact on patient quality of life.

Key Words: patient preference; repertory grid method; diabetes




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
B. C. Opmeer, R. el Moussaoui, P. M. M. Bossuyt, P. Speelman, J. M. Prins, and C. A. J. M. de Borgie
Costs associated with shorter duration of antibiotic therapy in hospitalized patients with mild-to-moderate severe community-acquired pneumonia
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2007; 60(5): 1131 - 1136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
A Robinson and R Thomson
Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools
Qual. Saf. Health Care, September 1, 2001; 10(90001): i34 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
A A Montgomery and T Fahey
How do patients' treatment preferences compare with those of clinicians?
Qual. Saf. Health Care, September 1, 2001; 10(90001): i39 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2001 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.