QSHC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dudley, N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dudley, N
Quality in Health Care 2001;10: i19-i22
© 2001 Quality in Health Care


I. Communicating and understanding risk

Importance of risk communication and decision making in cardiovascular conditions in older patients: a discussion paper

N Dudley, consultant in elderly medicine

St James's University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK

Dr N DudleyNigel.Dudley{at}leedsth.nhs.uk Abstract

Atrial fibrillation and aortic stenosis commonly present doctors and patients with difficult decisions about the risks and benefits of treatment options and are both often inappropriately undertreated. Patients may be confused by risk information and doctors may be aware of patients' limitations and use this to manipulate choices to the ones desired by the doctors. This paper examines the importance of risk communication and discusses difficulties that can arise in decision making in these two common cardiovascular conditions.

Key Words: patient preference; risk; informed choice; decision making; patient-caregiver communication; geriatrics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
P Knapp, D K Raynor, and D C Berry
Comparison of two methods of presenting risk information to patients about the side effects of medicines
Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2004; 13(3): 176 - 180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
A Edwards and G Elwyn
Understanding risk and lessons for clinical risk communication about treatment preferences
Qual. Saf. Health Care, September 1, 2001; 10(90001): i9 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
A J Lloyd
The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments
Qual. Saf. Health Care, September 1, 2001; 10(90001): i14 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
L Doyal
Informed consent: moral necessity or illusion?
Qual. Saf. Health Care, September 1, 2001; 10(90001): i29 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
L J Frewer, B Salter, and N Lambert
Understanding patients' preferences for treatment: the need for innovative methodologies
Qual. Saf. Health Care, September 1, 2001; 10(90001): i50 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2001 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.