|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
I. Communicating and understanding risk |
St James's University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
Dr N DudleyNigel.Dudley{at}leedsth.nhs.uk Abstract
Atrial fibrillation and aortic stenosis commonly present doctors and patients with difficult decisions about the risks and benefits of treatment options and are both often inappropriately undertreated. Patients may be confused by risk information and doctors may be aware of patients' limitations and use this to manipulate choices to the ones desired by the doctors. This paper examines the importance of risk communication and discusses difficulties that can arise in decision making in these two common cardiovascular conditions.
Key Words: patient preference; risk; informed choice; decision making; patient-caregiver communication; geriatrics
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P Knapp, D K Raynor, and D C Berry Comparison of two methods of presenting risk information to patients about the side effects of medicines Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2004; 13(3): 176 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Edwards and G Elwyn Understanding risk and lessons for clinical risk communication about treatment preferences Qual. Saf. Health Care, September 1, 2001; 10(90001): i9 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A J Lloyd The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments Qual. Saf. Health Care, September 1, 2001; 10(90001): i14 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L Doyal Informed consent: moral necessity or illusion? Qual. Saf. Health Care, September 1, 2001; 10(90001): i29 - 33. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L J Frewer, B Salter, and N Lambert Understanding patients' preferences for treatment: the need for innovative methodologies Qual. Saf. Health Care, September 1, 2001; 10(90001): i50 - 54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |